May 24, 2005
-- by Dave Johnson
Just so there is no misunderstanding, everything I have been saying approving last night's compromise on the filibuster does not mean that any Democrats should "compromise" on Social Security. There is nothing that needs "reforming."
Democrats have an alternative plan. It's called Social Security.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
I disagree. This is a perfect issue to use to talk about a more progressive tax system. Let's admit that there are potential problems in the distance, and raise the cap now.
Lot's of people have talked about 97k, I'd just like to see a big round 100k. Congress will steal anything extra that's not nailed down anyway, so let's plan on keeping extra just in case.
Posted by: Guy Montag at May 24, 2005 9:04 PM
I think we have made a mistake by fighting this entirely in the political arena. We need to take it to the crony capitalists who are pushing this monstrosity.
Posted by: Alice Marshall at May 25, 2005 6:55 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)