June 13, 2005
-- by Dave Johnson
On the other hand, many of the people who are losing their jobs voted for someone's job to get thrown of the island.
How did they do this? By voting for a lower tax, lower capital growth America, by voting, and continuing to vote, for rent, rather than labor or capital, being the favored sector of the economy. Simple test: until you are willing to repeal the massive deductions for buying or selling a home, don't bitch about your job going to India. You are voting for rent, and have to expect that employers will seek to use convenience (trade) to avoid paying for ground rent (the wages needed to buy said expensive home).
The collision course is this: if people want a society where there can be lucky big winners - that is people who bought in the right place at the right time - then they have to accept there will be unlucky big losers. That's what the egalitarian question means: if you want the right to screw someone else over and be lots richer than they are, then you have to give that right to others. Statisically speaking, you're gonna get screwed.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference For Whom the Rent Tolls:
» The Wicked Roundup from Pacific Views
The G8 nations have forgiven $40 billion worth of debt from countries too poor to even make their interest payments, earning them plenty of fulsome praise. George Monbiot explains why the terms are extortionist, and Naomi Klein gives a case... [Read More]
Tracked on June 14, 2005 9:16 AM
After reading three sentences and not understanding a word, I would have bet money that it was Stirling.
Posted by: richard at June 13, 2005 12:07 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)