July 15, 2005
-- by Dave Johnson
The latest excuse, Reports: Rove Learned About CIA Officer's Identity From Journalists.
OK, just for fun, suppose this is true that reporters called Rove telling him that Valerie Plame was a covert CIA operative. Why didn't Rove immediately go to the proper authorities to warn them about a serious security leak? Should someone with judgement like that be at the very top of our government?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
happy blogiversary dave!
Posted by: skippy at July 15, 2005 12:47 PM
Hello… Use below,
Bush Gang... TREASON ... Image
if U want 2… Roger@RogerART.com
Can’t see image… or Don’t want to open attachment
& Scroll Down…
Till U C Yellow... PROTEST PAINTINGS
Pass Image On If U want 2
Thank You, Roger@RogerART.com
Posted by: Roger Drowne EC at July 15, 2005 1:02 PM
Reply to your question Dave: NO!! However, this administration gets away with absolutely everything.
Posted by: Helga Fremlin at July 15, 2005 2:15 PM
It is possible that Rove *did* report the breach.
There is NO way that you, or I, or other non-cleared people would know if he did or did not.
Though I doubt it. I'm just saying that this may not be a good argument for the left to use, so we ought to steer clear of it. There's plenty of other good ones for now.
Bush said he'd fire any leaker.
We know those two indisputible things. Use them.
Posted by: Osama_Been_Forgotten at July 15, 2005 2:35 PM
I agree with Osama.
I also think that the only proper response to the "good faith" excuses being floated now is "then why did it take 2 years, a criminal investigation, and the jailing of a reporter to get Rove to admit his involvement?"
That sure doesn't sound like someone acting with good intentions now, does it?
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)