January 4, 2007
-- by Dave Johnson
Last month something ate up a tremendous amount of bandwidth at Seeing the Forest, costing me a lot of money. So now I regularly check bandwidth use.
Why has 22.214.171.124, HopOne in DC, been eating a HUGE amount of bandwidth? Gigabytes! What are they doing? (I banned them.)
Why has 126.96.36.199, an IP in India, been eating a tremendous amount of bandwidth? What are they doing?
Why has 188.8.131.52, an IP in Ukraine, been eating a tremendous amount of bandwidth? What are they doing?
Why has 184.108.40.206 AND 220.127.116.11 AND 18.104.22.168 AND 22.214.171.124 AND 126.96.36.199, all from the same company in Amsterdam, been eating a TREMENDOUS amount of bandwidth? What are they doing?
Why is 188.8.131.52 and 184.108.40.206 and Abacus America Inc.eating a TREMENDOUS amount of my bandwidth,
TrackBack URL for this entry:
I don't understand what you mean. In what sense are they "eating bandwidth"?
They are hitting the site over and over, using up gigabytes of bandwidth that I have to pay for.
Posted by: Dave Johnson at January 4, 2007 6:22 PM
Yeah, I've seen a huge bump in my blog's traffic, I haven't figured out what they're doing, but it ate like 4Gb of bandwidth last month. Now that you mention it, I checked last month's stats and yep, there's 220.127.116.11 producing 62% of my blog traffic. I did a little checking around the web and they're an obvious spam host. Banned.
Posted by: Charles at January 4, 2007 6:37 PM
This is definite spammer behavior. One problem is that the spammers keep trying to add comment or trackback spam and the traps don't catch the spam until after it's accessed the site and tried to add its garbage. What would work better is having a filter in your .htaccess file (depending how much you access you have to your host server).
For really egregious spammers, like the ones eating up your bandwidth, I've reported them to the owner of the domain region - that can put them out of business for awhile.
Posted by: Mary at January 4, 2007 10:52 PM
Of course! That is why my CGI page is so active - it's where the spam filters are working.
Posted by: Dave Johnson at January 5, 2007 9:16 AM
was this on election night?
Posted by: dr o at January 5, 2007 11:30 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)