April 25, 2007
-- by Dave Johnson
Bush says we need to 'win' the Iraq war. Can someone explain what that even means? Didn't we 'win' on 2003 when Saddam Hussein was overthrown as the President of Iraq?
If we 'win' who surrenders? If we 'win' who 'loses?'
Who are we fighting 'against' in Iraq?
Can anyone answer these questions? Any right-wingers care to weigh in?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
The problem with this war is that it's not a war. it's an occupation. And the only way to win an occupation is to leave.
Something magical and totally unexpected has to happen to make the architects of the war look great so that they can have been right all along. We're just waiting for that to happen.
Check out http://aquietevening.blogspot.com/2007/04/from-kremlin-to-white-house.html for more on idiotic people.
Posted by: Swan at April 25, 2007 3:59 PM
apparently Bush fucked up and committed a definition of victory to paper http://uggabugga.blogspot.com/2007/04/united-states-has-lost-in-iraq-by-very.html
Posted by: marc sobel at April 26, 2007 7:18 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)