<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Seeing the Forest</title>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/</link>
<description>A web magazine investigating how the Right operates.</description>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:14:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Unions: Sticking Together to Fight Corporate Power</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I have been writing about <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/why_they_and_yo_1.htm">the strike by California Kaiser Permanente security guards</a> working for contractor Inter-Con Security, who are demanding that laws be enforced and their rights be honored.</p>

<p>SEIU sent out a press release on the situation, titled, <a href="http://sev.prnewswire.com/health-care-hospitals/20080507/DC2170707052008-1.html">Workers With No Healthcare Protecting Kaiser Facilities, Security Contractor May Be Misleading California's Largest Healthcare Provider</a>.  In summary, the security guards at Kaiser are supposed to be provided with individual healthcare after working for 90 days, but it turns out that many are not.  The security contractor Inter-Con Security has found a way around the promise: they classify workers as "on-call" instead of permanent.<br />
<blockquote>As more and more workers report that Inter-Con is keeping workers on temporary or "on-call" status for months or years, it's still unclear whether Inter-Con is misleading Kaiser or if Kaiser is simply turning a blind eye to these tactics which short-change workers.</blockquote><br />
And their families are not provided with health insurance at all.  The security guards -- paid as little as $10.40 an hour -- are supposed to buy it.  The result is that 41% of the officers who responded to a survey cannot.  And without paid sick days they cannot afford to take the time off to see a doctor anyway.</p>

<p>So here we are with a company finding ways around a promise by changing the classification of the workers to "on-call."  This points out yet one more problem of workplaces that do not have unions.  How many people are classified as "temporary" or "contractors"?  This is one of the bigger scams that is going on these days.  One reason companies do this is because if someone is not an employee the employer doesn't have to pay their share of the Social Security payroll tax.  (There are other reasons as well, including avoiding paying promised benefits.)</p>

<p>How do you know if you should be called an employee or an independent contractor?  For a quick guideline, let's go <a href="http://www.irs.gov/charities/article/0,,id=128602,00.html">to the IRS</a>.  They say that by-and-large you are an employee,<br />
<blockquote>if the organization can control what will be done and how it will be done. This is so even if the organization gives the employee freedom of action. What matters is that the organization has the right to control the details of how the services are performed.</blockquote> <br />
Yet most of us see examples of people in this situation who are called "temporary workers" or "contractors" all the time.</p>

<p>Companies are not supposed to do this to us, but here's the thing: <strong>What can you do about it?</strong> You and I are individuals, alone.  But corporations have the ability to amass immense power and wealth and influence.  You and I as individuals must stand alone against this power and wealth.  What can you or I or anyone else do on our own?  The average person in our society has very little ability to stand up against this kind of power and wealth.</p>

<p>Over time people discovered that there are some things they can do that will work.  One of these has been to form unions.  By joining together the workers in a company can amass some power of their own.  The company needs the workers in order to function so the workers -- if they stick together -- have the ability to make the corporation obey employee/employer laws, provide decent pay, and all the other benefits that the unions have brought us.  This is why they are also call "organized labor."  By organizing into a union and sticking together people have the ability to demand respect and compensation for their work.</p>

<p>This is what the security guards at Kaiser are trying to do.  This is what you should do.</p>

<p>I encourage you to visit <a href="http://www.standforsecurity.org/">StandForSecurity.org</a>.</p>

<p>I am proud to be helping SEIU spread the word about this strike.  <img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2266/2471759246_09664a36d0_o.gif" width="234" height="60" alt="sfs-234x60-animated-v2" /></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/unions_sticking_1.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/unions_sticking_1.htm</guid>
<category>Labor</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:14:12 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>The &apos;L&apos; Curve</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Go see <a title="The L-Curve: A Graph of the US Income Distribution" href="http://lcurve.org/">The L-Curve: A Graph of the US Income Distribution</a>.  Click Zoom Out a few times, as well.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/the_l_curve.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/the_l_curve.htm</guid>
<category>Economics</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:07:29 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title> Right Wing magazines attack Cindy McCain</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Go read about it:  <a title="" href="http://nitpicker.blogspot.com/2008/05/right-wing-magazines-attack-cindy.html">Right Wing magazines attack Cindy McCain</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/right_wing_maga.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/right_wing_maga.htm</guid>
<category>Candidates</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:28:54 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>ANOTHER McCain Preacher Problem</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>See for yourself:</p>

<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WXZbIGJrDkg&border=0&rel=0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WXZbIGJrDkg&border=0&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>

<p>So when do you think the corporate media will start running <em>these</em> scary preacher tapes over and over?  </p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/another_mccain.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/another_mccain.htm</guid>
<category>Candidates</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:01:40 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>McCain&apos;s Preacher Problem</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>See for yourself -- John McCain has a preacher problem  of his own.  They show a scary video clip of Barack Obama's preacher over and over and over and over and over again but you won't see THESE videos on the corporate media.</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zASVwKZglAM&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zASVwKZglAM&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<p>Talking about Catholics:</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/uViQ0hVV57Q&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/uViQ0hVV57Q&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<p>I was talking to someone today who says he can't vote for Obama because of "the people he chooses to associate with" like Rev. Wright.<br />
Imagine of these were played over and over...</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/mccains_preache.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/mccains_preache.htm</guid>
<category>Candidates</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:01:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Why They (And You) Need A Union</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday <a href="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/security_guards_1.htm">I wrote about the security guards who are striking</a> at Kaiser Permanente because their contractor-employer is engaging in illegal tactics while trying to block them from forming a union.  The guards work for Inter-Con Security Inc., which is contracted by Kaiser to provide security services.</p>

<p>You can read articles with details about what happened with the strike yesterday <a href="http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/05/06/18497385.php">here</a> and <a href="http://www.entrepreneur.com/localnews/1631232.html">here</a>.  (There is close to zero coverage of this strike in newspapers.  But you wouldn't expect a corporate-owned media to provide information about labor, now would you?)</p>

<p>Please visit the site <a href="http://www.standforsecurity.org/">Stand for Security</a> for background and details about the security guards' fight to form a union.</p>

<p>While this strike is about violations of workers' rights, there are very good reasons for their three-year effort to form a union.</p>

<p>In Oregon, the state just north of California, Kaiser Permanente security guards are employed by Kaiser, not by a contractor.  They are unionized and here is a short chart of just some of the difference this makes.<br />
<table border = "1" cellpadding = "2"><tr><th> </th><th>In-House Union (ILWU)<br>Kaiser Security Officers</th><th>Inter-Con Officers at Kaiser</th></tr><tr><br />
<td>Wages</td><td>$15 - $18 per hour<br>(Oregon has a much lower<br>cost of living)</td><td>As little as $10.40 per hour</td></tr></p>

<p><tr><td>Raises</td><td>$.70 - $1.45/hour annually,<br><br />
depending on seniority<br><br />
(Guaranteed in writing!)</td><td>No schedule, no guarantee</td></tr></p>

<p><tr><td>Free Family Health Care</td><td>YES</td><td>NO</td></tr><br />
<tr><td>Health Insurance Elegibility</td><td>20 hours worked</td><td>“Full-time”, which for many<br><br />
officers means 1-2 years of<br><br />
working 40 hours a week before<br><br />
qualifying for health insurance.</td></tr><br />
<tr><td>Bereavement Pay</td><td>3 days paid time off</td><td>none</td></tr><br />
<tr><td>Sick Leave</td><td>1.6 hours per pay period<br><br />
(Time accrues)</td><td>none</td></tr><br />
<tr><td>Jury Duty</td><td>Paid off as needed</td><td>none</td></tr><br />
<tr><td>Pension</td><td>YES</td><td>none</td></tr><br />
<tr><td>Grievance Procedure</td><td>YES</td><td>none</td></tr><br />
<tr><td>Shift Differential</td><td>$.90/hour evenings<br />
$1.25/hour nights</td><td>none</td></tr><br />
</table></p>

<p><strong>This chart is an example of the difference that a union makes.</strong>  The column on the left -- the one with <em>better</em> pay, health care, sick days, pension and other benefits -- is the workers who are <em>in</em> a union.  The column on the right is these security guards.  So this is why these security guards have been fighting for three years to join a union.  The employer, Inter-Con Security won't even give <em>sick days</em>!  For people working in <em>hospitals</em>!  What are these workers supposed to do?  And they won't even pay when the workers have <em>jury duty</em>!  (Shouldn't a company be concerned about the greater public good, like a court system that works?)</p>

<p>But this chart is also representative of <em>other</em> workplaces, showing the difference that forming a union can make for <em>other</em> workers.  How <em>else</em> are workers going to get back their rights, get health care, get pensions, and get paid?  If you see a better idea out there, please let us all know because this strike and the things happening to these security guards shows that it is very very difficult to form a union.  In today's environment where workers are afraid of employers moving their jobs overseas - or even just laying them off and telling everyone else to work harder - and then giving their pay out as raises to the executives and multi-million-dollar bonuses to the CEO, this is a very brave action to take.  </p>

<p>On top of that, the Republican government has stacked the labor Department and the National Labor Relations Board to side with the big corporations.  So it is even harder to form a union than ever.  Which is, of course, why wages are stagnating and CEO pay is off the charts.</p>

<p>This is why these workers are striking -- to demand that their civil rights be honored and to demand that their right to form a union be honored.  These security guards are placing everything on the line -- and doing this for all of us.  If they win this fight, all of us are a step further toward our rights being honored, and toward our own jobs paying more and giving benefits.</p>

<p><br />
I am proud to be helping SEIU spread the word about this strike.  <img alt="sfs-234x60-animated-v2.gif" src="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/STFphotos/sfs-234x60-animated-v2.gif" width="234" height="60" /></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/why_they_and_yo_1.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/why_they_and_yo_1.htm</guid>
<category>Labor</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 08:20:44 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Teacher Performs Magic Trick, Gets Fired For &quot;Wizardry&quot;</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Here we go...  A Florida teacher performed a "disappearing toothpick trick" and a parent complained.  The teacher was fired for "wizardry."</p>

<p><a title="Substitute Teacher Says Wizardry Accusation Cost Him Job" href="http://suncoastpasco.tbo.com/content/2008/may/05/substitute-teacher-says-wizardry-accusation-cost-h/">Substitute Teacher Says Wizardry Accusation Cost Him Job</a><blockquote>She told Piculas there had been a complaint about his performance at Rushe Middle School in Land O' Lakes.</p>

<p>He asked what she meant.</p>

<p>"She said, 'You've been accused of wizardry,' " Piculas said.</p>

<p>He said the statement seemed bizarre to him, like something out of Harry Potter.</p>

<p>Piculas said he replied, "I have no idea what you're talking about."</p>

<p>He said he also told Sinclair, "It's not black magic. It's a toothpick."</blockquote>Better not have a license plate with '666' on it in Florida!</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/teacher_perform.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/teacher_perform.htm</guid>
<category>Right-Wing Takeover</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:06:04 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Elderly Indiana Nuns Can&apos;t Vote - Nuns Don&apos;t Have ID</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Even though there has never been a case of voter fraud in Indiana the Republican Supreme Court upheld an Indiana voter-suppression law forbidding the elderly, poor and minorities from voting because they have trouble obtaining ID.  (These groups tend to vote Democratic.)</p>

<p>It was estimated that this law would prevent approx. 43,000 people from voting.  Here is an example of the law's effect:  <href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/193490.php">Indiana nuns lacking ID denied at poll</a>,<blockquote>About 12 Indiana nuns were turned away Tuesday from a polling place ... because they didn't have state or federal identification bearing a photograph.</p>

<p>. . . The nuns, all in their 80s or 90s, didn't get one [ID] but came to the precinct anyway.</p>

<p>. . . Some showed up with outdated passports. None of them drives.</p>

<p>They weren't given provisional ballots because it would be impossible to get them to a motor vehicle branch and back in the 10-day time frame allotted by the law, Sister McGuire said. "You have to remember that some of these ladies don't walk well. They're in wheelchairs or on walkers or electric carts."</blockquote>So these were just 12 of the 43,000 who will not be allowed to vote now.</p>

<p><a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/nuns-by-dday-primary-results-from.html">See Digby</a>, too.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/elderly_indiana.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/elderly_indiana.htm</guid>
<category>Right-Wing Takeover</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:17:56 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Security Guards Striking for the Right to Have Our Laws Enforced (updated)</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a three-day strike <a href="http://www.insidebayarea.com/ci_9162021">starting today</a> at Kaiser Permanente hospitals in California.  1800 security guards are striking for three days in an "unfair labor practice" action.  This strike is not against Kaiser and is not to ask for money or benefits; it is not even to form a union in the first place.  <strong><em>This</em> strike is just to ask that our laws please be enforced.</strong>  This may be a lot to ask for in today's corporate-dominated system, but they’re asking for it anyway.</p>

<p>Here is some background:</p>

<p>Rather than directly employ security guards Kaiser contracts with a company called <a href="http://www.icsecurity.com/">Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.</a>  Inter-Con hires and manages the security guards for Kaiser, paying them very little and giving them few benefits - not even sick leave.  So these security guards, even though they work at Kaiser, (some for many years), are paid far less than other security guards at Kaiser facilities in other states, and receive few benefits.  Kaiser is one of the more responsible, unionized companies for its workers, which makes this situation even worse for these workers.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/security_guards_1.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/security_guards_1.htm</guid>
<category>Labor</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 06:18:11 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>McCain Didn&apos;t Vote For Bush!</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a title="Arianna Huffington: What John McCain Told Me, and What it Says About How Far He's Fallen - Politics on The Huffington Post" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/what-john-mccain-told-me_b_100183.html">Arianna Huffington: What John McCain Told Me, and What it Says About How Far He's Fallen</a></p>

<p>Yee-Ha, the wingnuts are going to go ... well they already <em>are</em> nuts!  Can they go more nuts than they are?  </p>

<p>Go read!</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_didnt_vo.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/mccain_didnt_vo.htm</guid>
<category>Candidates</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:23:59 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sun Ra!</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Over at <a title="Eschaton" href="http://www.eschatonblog.com/2008_05_04_archive.html#4409552369189644005">Eschaton</a> they're watching SUN RA!!!</p>

<p>Some of you know that Sun Ra is the official Arkestra from Mars of Seeing the Forest.  So the vision is spreading!</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sfbk4QAjgXo&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Sfbk4QAjgXo&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<p>And for fun, Pink Elephants:</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bfLpnXQpjvw&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bfLpnXQpjvw&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<p>Now that you have been introduced, here's Sun Ra:  (Sun Ra was not born.  Sun Ra arrived.)</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sApYx27yfnw&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sApYx27yfnw&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>

<p>Beautiful, beautiful.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/sun_ra.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/sun_ra.htm</guid>
<category>Music</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 09:34:24 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Teflon John (McCain)</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Here's Teflon John from <a title="Max and the Marginalized" href="http://maxmarginal.blogspot.com/">Max and the Marginalized</a></p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j2VmDZt-RRI&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j2VmDZt-RRI&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/teflon_john_mcc.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/teflon_john_mcc.htm</guid>
<category>Music</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:25:49 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Today&apos;s Jobs Report</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>We had a GOOD jobs report today from the ever-trustable Bush administration.  <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080502/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/economy_191">Employers cut fewer jobs in April, jobless rate falls</a>,<blockquote>Employers cut far fewer jobs in April than in recent months and the unemployment rate dropped to 5 percent, a better-than-expected showing that nonetheless reveals strains in the nation's labor market.</blockquote>All I'll say is that the Labor Department uses a model that said 45,000 jobs were GAINED in construction.  As homebuilding nosedives and with commercial construction starting its own nosedive, the Labor Department's model says that 45,000 jobs were <em>GAINED</em> in the economy.  We all know that construction jobs were lost, not gained.  So we simply do not know what is happening with employment and certainly cannot believe this report.</p>

<p>Remember, since the 2001 recession they say we have had remarkably low unemployment.  But we also know that most of the lost jobs never returned, and most new jobs pay much less.  Most of the people I know who were laid off in the dot-bomb crash never found similar jobs, and are all making a lot less -- some never found ANY job.  (Some work as bloggers, making $60 a month.)</p>

<p>So read this, about the screwy statistics:  <a href="http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/05/april-jobs-another-report-from-bizarro.html">April Jobs - Another Report From Bizarro World</a>,<blockquote>Once again the BLS should be embarrassed to report this data. Its model suggests that there was 45,000 jobs coming from new construction businesses, 72,000 jobs coming from professional services, and a whopping 267,000 jobs in total coming from net new business creation.</p>

<p>. . . Repeating what I said last month, virtually no one can possibly believe this data. The data is so bad, I doubt those at the BLS even believe it. But that is what their model says so that is what they report. Just as there is mark to model in the investment world, there is mark to model in the BLS world.</p>

<p>. . . With housing falling like a rock and commercial real estate now following suit, the BLS is assuming that 45,000 new jobs were added in construction. With lenders blowing up and countless self employed real estate professional exiting the business the BLS is assuming 8,000 new jobs were added in financial activities and 72,000 jobs from professional and business services. The total number of jobs added in April by such absurd assumptions was 267,000 jobs.</blockquote></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/todays_jobs_rep.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/todays_jobs_rep.htm</guid>
<category>Economics</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 10:11:19 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mainstreaming Racial Hate</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at this.  This is an example of "mainstreaming" of white supremacist hate, over at the "conservative" Human Events site.  Thjs is from MSNBC commentator Pat Buchanan.  If this is what they are doing in May, imagine what we'll be seeing as the election gets closer.</p>

<p><a title="The Way Our World Ends - HUMAN EVENTS" href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26323">The Way Our World Ends - HUMAN EVENTS</a>,<blockquote>In 1950, whites were 28 percent of world population and Africans 9 percent, a ratio of three-to-one. In 2060, the ratio will remain the same. But the colors will be reversed. People of African ancestry will be 25 percent of the world's population. People of European descent will have fallen to 9.8 percent.</p>

<p>More arresting is that the white population is shrinking not only in relative but in real terms. Two hundred million white people, one in every six on earth -- a number equal to the entire population of France, Britain, Holland and Germany -- will vanish by 2060.</p>

<p>The Caucasian race is going the way of the Mohicans.</blockquote>Wow.</p>

<p>And be sure to scan the comments:<br />
<blockquote>What have YOU been doing for the white race?</p>

<p>I never heard whether you are married. Are you, and do you have any children?</blockquote></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/mainstreaming_r.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/mainstreaming_r.htm</guid>
<category>Human Rights</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 08:15:37 -0800</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mission Accomplished Day</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Today is Mission Accomplished Day.  Great Job, Bushie!</p>

<p><img alt="Mission-accomplished.jpg" src="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/STFphotos/Mission-accomplished.jpg" width="278" height="370" /></p>

<p>I think maybe 70% of the public thinks Bush actually flew the plane and landed it on the carrier.  (120% of FOX viewers, of course.)</p>

<p>Bush was a passenger.  He didn't fly the plane.  He isn't allowed to fly planes.  Back in his National Guard days he had to stop flying when he refused to take a drug test, and then stopped showing up for duty entirely, even though there was a war going on.</p>

<p><img alt="Bush-FlightSuit.jpg" src="http://www.seeingtheforest.com/STFphotos/Bush-FlightSuit.jpg" width="332" height="434" /><br />
</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/mission_accompl.htm</link>
<guid>http://www.seeingtheforest.com/archives/2008/05/mission_accompl.htm</guid>
<category>Bush</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 07:36:38 -0800</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>